Recommended NZ | Guide to Money | Gimme: Competitions - Giveaways

New Bill seeks to disarm bright-line traps - CAANZ

Contributor:
Fuseworks Media
Fuseworks Media

Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand is welcoming the intent of a Bill responding to the peak membership body’s warning of bright-line traps for nomadic homeowners, but says that some pitfalls still remain.

Under the current rules, ‘main-home owners’ are granted a continuous safe harbour period of up to 365 days where they do not need to occupy the home. NZ Tax Leader John Cuthbertson had warned that in many instances this wouldn’t be long enough to protect them from the bright-line coming into effect, for example, homes that take longer than 12 months to build.

A new Taxation Bill intends to give these new homeowners more leeway, so that they are not caught out by the bright-line test if their home takes more than 12 months to build.

But questions around the proposed Bill have been raised, particularly how the phrase, ‘reasonable efforts to construct a dwelling intended for use as their main home,’ will be interpreted. Relevant questions from CA ANZ include ‘when do reasonable efforts to construct a dwelling commence,’ and what is captured by the term 'to construct’?

"Construction arguably implies the physical erection of a home. What needs to be included here is the whole build process. It’s important that resource consenting, geo-tech reporting, building design and other elements of the build process are covered in this change," says NZ Tax Leader John Cuthbertson.

"It’s also important that the short period of time between when an owner acquires the land and starts actively engaging in the building process falls with the main home exclusion. That’s something all parties would want to see."

"This is a recognition that to build a house, you have to purchase a piece of land, and that building doesn’t commence immediately, but within a reasonable time."

Additionally, the proposed change to the 365-day safe harbour period does not include taxpayers in other circumstances that could easily run longer than 12 months, such as secondments, displacement due to natural disasters, end of life care or other common life occurrences.

"Overseas secondments for our large accounting firms, and even government departments like MFAT all run to about two years, long enough to trigger a pro-rata tax obligation if they sell within the bright-line period," says Mr Cuthbertson.

"If your home becomes uninhabitable for over a year due to a natural disaster such as fire, flood or earthquake, that will also trigger the bright-line rule for those homeowners, and we’ve had all three of those disasters in recent times."

"As many people will be aware, the insurance process can take time and would increase the period when people are outside their main home."

"There’s also a range of end-of-life scenarios - say you become unwell, go into hospital, and then move straight to a rest home or other care, with family then clearing out the home for sale - that could easily run over 365 days."

"It’s good to see the Government has moved to address our specific concern around the construction of new homes. We like the intent here, but there’s still some work to do on the current drafting," concluded Mr Cuthbertson.

All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.