Recommended NZ | Guide to Money | Gimme: Competitions - Giveaways

Better Use Of Doctors Rather Than More Money

Contributor:
Voxy News Engine
Voxy News Engine
Gareth Morgan
Gareth Morgan

Rather than spending more money on doctors, we first need to make better use of the ones we have, argues economist Gareth Morgan.

Morgan's comments come on the heels of a new OECD survey which put New Zealand at the bottom on a survey of 28 nations for doctor/patient ratios having just 0.8 senior doctors per 1000 patients.

"This should come as no surprise," argues Morgan "because our national incomes are nearly bottom of the heap too".

"New Zealand spends as much on healthcare as we can afford, and we can't keep increasing spending as we have in the past. The basic issue is that we keep expecting a champagne health service on a beer budget".

Morgan believes there is also some evidence of higher than average productivity in the NZ health sector which would imply a lower doctor/patient ratio as a result of that efficiency.

"Ultimately, if we want to materially improve the outcomes from our health service we have to boost our national income. Without this we will have to keep relying on making our health service more efficient and effective."

"We have doctors working in small provincial hospitals who are twiddling their thumbs. The public needs to understand that we can't afford to have a hospital on every street corner any more. Our doctors need to be put to the greatest possible use and part of the answer is having fewer, bigger, more efficient hospitals."

Morgan co-authored a book on the New Zealand health system entitled Health Cheque, with former Treasury analyst Geoff Simmons. Health Cheque found that small provincial hospitals are more expensive, undertake fewer procedures and can't offer comprehensive care.

"Serious patients end up being transferred to larger regional hospitals regardless, and doctors don't want to work in these hospitals as they prefer the chance to improve their skills by working in larger teams. As a result provincial hospitals end up being staffed by expensive temporary locum staff, many of whom are foreign trained."

Comments

GM is correct. The problem

GM is correct. The problem with just putting more money in is that the unions just get bigger salaries arguing they need australian pay and no new money gets to the patient.

Australia, Canada, US, Ireland all have fewer than OECD average doctors. And these countires spend the most on health! These doctors earn the most and there are still far fewer than poor countries.

Czech republic, Greece etc have heaps of doctors even though they are paid are pittance. Technincally, MCNZ does not consider these doctors actual doctors as they are not permitted to work in NZ. It would be interesting to see the per capita rates of doctors in each country who would be eliglible to work here. NZ would be amongst the top half dozen I predict!

NZ should cap health spending to inflation and reward staff for effiencies and not just grant arbitrary 3times inflation pay rises. Also don't listen to moronic doctor unions who only want more money for doing less work.

Competitions and Giveaways from Gimme.co.nz

Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff.  Links will open on Gimme.

Featured Recommendations from recommended.co.nz

All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.