[ login or create an account ]
|

According to Lionel Barber, the editor of the Financial Times, the majority of newspapers will be charging for access to their online content within a year. As newspaper publishers finally prepare their strategies for confronting the challenge of the Internet, you feel their direction in the next twelve months and whether they follow this path will have massive implications for their print editions.
Newspaper sales have been severely dented by the rise of the Internet, particularly in the United States where they embraced the Internet as the main provider for news a lot quicker than their antipodean relations.
Barber said that the industry still needs to figure out a way to charge readers without turning them away, be it subscription-based models or the like.
News Corp has already moved some of its websites, namely its financial flagships, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times, to a subscription service where certain sections of their websites are restricted to paying costumers.
The New York Times will soon be following suit.
The implications here will be massive.
Surely online subscriptions for newspaper content would further doom the print editions?
It’s unlikely people will fork out twice for both online and print editions of what is essentially the same product and given the obvious advantage of online content, speed of the news, it’s not a difficult prediction to suggest online will win out for the readers hard earned dollars.
But with the depth and variety of news content already on the Internet, a pay per view system could risk driving away thousands of readers who will simply search through Google for their free news fix and find it elsewhere.
The newspapers must ensure they are offering premium quality if they are going to be asking for subscriptions.
But how long does the print edition have left to live?
There are some simple and mundane things about print that will be missed.
For some, the Internet will never be able to replace the feeling of holding a magazine or newspaper in your hand.
There remains something appealing about that sensation.
As the adage goes, have you tried sitting on the toilet reading a laptop?
It’s not the same.
Whether the loyal print lovers are enough to sustain the whole print industry in the face of the Internet remains doubtful.
However, you have to wonder if the plan to charge users for online content is the right way to save the industry.
Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff. Links will open on Gimme.
Health Tips, Recommended Movies, Recommended Books, Recommended Places.
Links will open on recommended.co.nz.
All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.
The latest money guides from authoritative New Zealand sources: Investing, KiwiSaver & Saving, Managing Money, Home Loans, Credit Cards, Tax.
Links will take you to guide2.co.nz.
Compare Credit Cards - Interest rate and fees comparisons for New Zealand banks.
Comments
I don't think it's a matter
I don't think it's a matter of 'will they pay?', but 'how much is reasonable?' Once the pay for view model does catch on, it will do so quickly. People only have so much time. Once the main news sites become 'viewer pays' people will tire of trying to find other free sites that are as good. There's also the issue of credibility. Reputable journalists will always rise to the top over anonymous bloggers and people are likely to pay for that so long as quality is kept up.
They'll have to be careful they don't charge too much, alienate their audience and lose ad potential...after all the audience is the real product.
However, it won't be the end of print as broadband coverage in rural New Zealand hasn't kept pace with urban centres. For those guys print is essential to keep up with what is happening.