[ login or create an account ]
|

Never before has a large budget Hollywood film focused on the life of Nelson Mandela, or even rugby for that matte, but in one fell swoop Clint Eastwood has brought us the film ‘Invictus’ with Morgan Freeman acting as Mandela and Matt Damon playing the nation's rugby captain Francois Pienaar. Some people might say this is a strange way to tell the story of Mandela by intertwining it within the 1995 rugby world cup, but this story isn’t really just about Mandela, it's more about how he brought his fractured nation together with the combined love of the sport.
“The film tells the inspiring true story of how Nelson Mandela joined forces with the captain of South Africa's rugby team to help unite their country. Newly elected President Mandela knows his nation remains racially and economically divided in the wake of apartheid. Believing he can bring his people together through the universal language of sport, Mandela rallies South Africa's rugby team as they make their historic run to the 1995 Rugby World Cup Championship match.”
I’ve seen a lot of films that Eastwood’s directed over the years and I do find him to be a bit of a ‘hit-and-miss’ director. Even in some of his better films he can sometimes make strange choices that seem to let the film down, but this of course has never hurt his award winning status as often his films get nominated for swags of awards each year. With ‘Invictus’ I feel he has again made a flawed film while at the same time producing performances that are worthy of praise. Both Freeman and Damon played their parts brilliantly but the film itself felt fractured and it struggled to focus on what it needed to focus on, which was the two main characters. There was also a side story following Mandela’s security force, which is now mixed black and white, and how they needed to work together to protect the president. Though this provided some good moments I felt there was a bit too much attention put on this particular storyline.
At the end of the day it was a good film and it was great seeing rugby up on the big screen and the All Blacks portrayed as the team to beat, but it just never fully stacked up as a solid film. Also they ignored the fact that half our team was poisoned and that’s the only way they were able to beat us in the final!
7 out of 10 from me.
Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff. Links will open on Gimme.
Health Tips, Recommended Movies, Recommended Books, Recommended Places.
Links will open on recommended.co.nz.
All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.
Voxy: Your Voice - Uncensored
Got Something to Say But No One’s Listening?
Message to Spread? – Distribute News
Product to Promote? – Run a Promotion
We Can Help You Spread The Word.
Comments
Yes, to support a team of
Yes, to support a team of chokers you need to come up with wild excuses about the ghost of Suzy who poisoned the team before the 95 world cup. What's your excuse for every world cup loss after that?
So, can I assume from your
So, can I assume from your points made above your a movie director and historian?
Wow you must have such a cool life, can I be your friend ?
I arrived a few minutes late
I arrived a few minutes late and had to sit at the front of the audience. At the end of the movie, when the credits scroll, everyone gets up to get out first. I stayed for a while to let my emotions settle, but when I thought that I'd look ridiculous, I got up and left. You know what? I was the first one out; everyone else was impacted more than I was. Well done CE; somebody understands reconciliation.