Recommended.co.nz | Voxy.co.nz | Guide2.co.nz: (Money | Politics) | Gimme.co.nz

Remembrances Of Beer Logos Past

Contributor:
Lisa Scott
Lisa Scott

Why would anyone want to preserve the mistakes of the past? Why would a person with even a shred of sense and at the least one or two brain enzymes firing declare in their last will and testament that they wanted their tattoos kept from cremation, removed and preserved for posterity? And what for? To add to a blanket? Wall art? A lampshade?

Jonathan Fowler's grieving New Plymouth mother is upset that the Public Trust failed to inform her of the content of her son's last will and testament and as a result, Jonathan and his collection of body art have been consigned to the great yonder. Were they so wrong? Perhaps one could imagine certain sensitivity to losing a life-time of yakuza art, covering the entire body in a beautiful papyrus of ink. Or closer to home, if, having undergone the trial of a hand-tapped, traditional Polynesian tattoo, maybe it could seem realistic to feel a little loath to part with the skin you're in. But flaying the flesh from your body does rather hint at a kind of animal simplicity, a rock cave, wall art mentality, the urge to salt a favourite hide.

In the case of Jonathan, a cystic fibrosis sufferer, the tattoos in question included a Playboy Bunny symbol, a DB logo, (Jonathan was the number one collector of Export merchandise and was cremated in an Export Gold coffin) an Aries sign and his ascendant sign, Taurus. Hardly the Tattooed man. His mother is furious that the Public Trust failed to inform her of her son's ludicrous last wish, and that the representative she complained to dared to voice the opinion that it was 'gruesome.' The least they can do is write a big check for the cystic fibrosis charity, she opines. I'm sorry? What for? They were probably embarrassed on Jonathan's behalf. 

I have tattoos, of course I do, in fact I have two of them. Like divorce and DIC, these things are rights of passage in the Scott family. But I wouldn't care to preserve them; in fact they are doing a good job, thanks to the sun and the weathering of my skin, of eradicating themselves. Preserving my tattoos would be about as silly as stuffing my ex-husband and mounting him on a stand in the living room, as ridiculous as Lisa Lewis keeping the condoms from her one-night stands. Nobody should have to dwell on the past, ink or mis-think, and while I'm sorry for her loss, perhaps Jonathan's mother should just move on. What would she have done with his tattoos anyway? There are only so many conversations you can have with a jar of formaldehyde.
 

Comments

I love my tattoos. They are

I love my tattoos. They are beautifully done and each has its' special meaning or reason.
However, keeping them after my death, would not help in anything, except keeping my reputation as a stupid person after I'm gone.
Then again, I don't have this reputation now. Why should it be started after I'm dead?

I wonder what excuse should one find for keeping his skin after him.

A good example would be keeping the foreskin after the circumcision... WTF?

(Pardon my French)

but a tattooed foreskin, now

but a tattooed foreskin, now that would be interesting! Might make an interesting hat for a pet rat. Or a small dog in your case Elad.

A small dog, a pet rat or

A small dog, a pet rat or even a goldfish, would look really stupid wearing a hat saying "Welcome to Jamaica and have a nice day!"...

*Correction: It would be

*Correction:
It would be very appealing for the goldfish et al. However, it is not very respectful towards the Jamaicans and their country.
Besides, would you sacrifice your dog's honor just to treasure my memory?
You can find pictures of Prince Albert in Wikipedia. I think this is a memory that should be treasured.

I think Jono has a right to

I think Jono has a right to ask for what he wants in his will. Who are you to comment on this. Mind your own business.

I completely agree with you.

I completely agree with you. However, isn't it quite a peculiar request?
This is what the article is all about.
Did you search for images of "Prince Albert" like I mentioned before?
Do it and write your thoughts about framing my Prince Albert and mounting it on the wall. I have every right to ask for that...

The point is not what he

The point is not what he wanted done, it is that the Public Trust didn't fufill their duty as the executor of the will.

The poor guy spent most of his life in a hospital, these were pieces of his trying to have normal experiences - I imagine being able to look at them and remember when he was really sick was important.

I doubt that they COULD

I doubt that they COULD fuflfil his wishes, and isn't it illegal to store parts (no matter how paper-thin) of dead bodies?. Anyway this blog is just an opinion, reflecting the first impressions of anyone in NZ like me, who woke, turned on the radio and heard this story on the news. Opinions, as everyone knows, are like arseholes, everyone's got one.

As you said, opinions are

As you said, opinions are like arseholes. Everyone has got one.
In NZ there are more sheep than people.
Shouldn't the opinion of the majority be herd?
(*It was not a spelling mistake. It was a joke. If you didn't get it, go bury yourself with your body art still attached).

Whilst I agree that the

Whilst I agree that the request of the deceased man was rather unusual, this matter does bring to the fore the fact that Public Trust has a reputation for being expensive and at the same time inefficient.

My mother died in 1999 and Public Trust failed to execute her Will. It took an expensive legal battle and 10 years to get her Will sorted.

So, yes, the guy's request was pretty odd but it was his body after all. Public Trust, as the executors, had a responsibility to read and act upon his Will, which they failed to do, so I think the request of the mother for them to make a donation to the Cystic Fibrosis Charity would be some kind of a peace offering for their incompetance.

What sick bastard would want

What sick bastard would want to keep his crappy tattoos.

Well that rules out Jonathon

Well that rules out Jonathon Fowler being a sick bastard doesn't it? He didn't want to keep his "crappy tattoos" now did he? He was giving them away... LOL

Oh, and Lisa, its not a right of passage, its a rite of passage, as in ritual. Go back to school and learn your basic Engrish stoof eh?

'sigh'

'sigh'

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <img> <br> <br /> <ul> <ol> <li> <em> <b> <u> <i> <strong>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

You can change the default for this field in "Comment follow-up notification settings" on your account edit page.