[ login or create an account ]
|

ACC has today released proposals for increases to ACC levies as part of its annual levy setting process.
[Related: Proposed ACC Levy Changes: Q + A]
The proposals relate to three ACC levies: Work levy rates that provide cover for work-related personal injuries; earners' levy rates that provide cover for non work-related personal injuries (e.g. at home or at sport); and motor vehicle rates that provide cover for personal injuries involving moving motor vehicles on public roads.
ACC chairman John Judge said the need to increase levies was driven by many factors.
``An increase in the number of claims received annually, rising health costs and Scheme extensions have been major contributors to the need to increase levies to cover the current costs of the Scheme,'' he said. Private health insurer Southern Cross also cited rising claim numbers and healthcare costs increasing well above the rate of inflation as key drivers for their deficit reported yesterday.
``We are also taking a more realistic approach to estimating future costs and liability. Other factors such as the global recession have had a compounding effect,'' Mr Judge said.
Mr Judge noted ACC is required to develop its levy proposals under existing legislative provisions. However, the Minister for ACC is introducing amendments to the ACC legislation that will have an impact on the final levy rates set for 2010/11 - in particular extending the date by which the Scheme must be fully funded. In addition, ACC is also undertaking a number of initiatives which may reduce the need for levy increases in the order it is proposing.
``The ACC Board appreciates there's a limit to how much New Zealanders should be expected to pay in ACC levies, and that many will view the prospect of levy increases at this time with dismay. We wish to stress that levy increases are not seen as the only answer to the challenges confronting the ACC Scheme - the focus must be on other ways to make the Scheme more sustainable and affordable in the long run.'' The following table provides an indication of proposed levy rates based on some of these initiatives and changes to legislation taking effect.
Earners' levy While growing claims for home and sports injuries have put pressure on the Earners' Account, the big increase this year is largely because the levy rate has been too low since 2007/08. ``I understand the decision last year to set the Earners' levy rate lower than required to adequately fund the account was driven by the recession and the impact on people's income,'' Mr Judge said, ``but this is unsustainable.''
Motorcycle levies Within the motor vehicle levy changes (summarised in the above table) ACC is proposing major changes to motorcycle levies to take into account the fact that for several years, car drivers have been subsidising motorcycle and moped riders.
The new levies reflect the fact that motorcycle riders are 16 times more likely to be involved in a road crash than any other road users and are far more likely to be seriously injured. In 2008/09 ACC paid more than $62 million for motorcycle riders but collected only $12.3 million in levies from them.
Even with the significant proposed increases in the rates payable by motorcycle and moped drivers to redress this imbalance, car drivers will still continue to subsidise motorcycle and moped drivers by $77 a year for the 2010/2011 year.
``The proposed legislative change to extend the full funding date to 2019 would reduce the effect of residual claims on motor vehicle levies by $100,'' said Mr Jusge. ``However, whether or not this translates into an equivalent reduction in those levies will depend on how best to fund the account fully over the next 10 years. This is something the Board must determine.''
The proposals also change the categories for mopeds and motorcycles, by grouping mopeds and motorcycles together and introducing three sub-classes for 0-125 cc, 126-600 cc and 601+ cc cycles.
Preventing further deterioration ``Along with other changes, levy increases are needed to help avoid further deterioration in our financial position,'' Mr Judge said.
``The proposed increases only deal with the current shortfall in funding and largely go towards paying the ongoing costs of existing claims - not future cost increases or increases in demand for services.
``Government is proposing legislative changes which, if passed, will reduce the size of levy increases. When the Amendment is passed, the Board will reconsider its funding requirements and levy recommendations to the Minister. Despite this, the proposed rates we are releasing today show how bad the situation has really become,'' Mr Judge said.
Consultation Mr Judge said the ACC Board's final view on levy increases will be informed by consultation and it will then make appropriate recommendations for Government to consider and to make a final decision.
Further information, including consultation documents and actuarial reports relating to setting levy rates and the estimated outstanding claims liability, is available from www.acc.co.nz/consultation. Alternatively, call 0800 ACC RATES (0800 222 728) or send an email with your request to consultation@acc.co.nz.
Making a submission ACC is encouraging New Zealanders and affected organisations to have their say.
Submissions must include: Your name Your address Your contact phone number(s)
You can send your submission: By post: Levy Consultation ACC PO Box 242 Wellington 6140 By fax: 04 918 4395 By email: consultation@acc.co.nz
Deadline for submissions: 5pm, 10 November 2009
Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff. Links will open on Gimme.
Health Tips, Recommended Movies, Recommended Books, Recommended Places.
Links will open on recommended.co.nz.
All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.
Voxy: Your Voice - Uncensored
Got Something to Say But No One’s Listening?
Message to Spread? – Distribute News
Product to Promote? – Run a Promotion
We Can Help You Spread The Word.
Comments
i have been riding
i have been riding motorcycles for 35 years and i have not had an acc claim , i do not think sting me for the failure of ACC to manage its money properly ,and it will make the owners of big kike brake the lawyer ,by changing plates to a smaller bikes plate ,have ACC looked at trail bikes ??? .maybe ACC should review its staffing levels to sale a mil or two .............
Easy argument
Easy argument really:
Obviously they do not know anything about motorcyling, the most experienced riders have large bikes and the least experienced have small bikes. But the levy is greater on the larger bike even though injuries would be the same, also less likely to have an accident on a larger bike, more easily seen, less likely to be caught with a lack of power when overtaking, the training on motorcycles is far more comprehensive than in cars, as stats tell us cars cause most of the motorcycle accidents and to top it all why should any motorcyclist with private health insurance be hit with these high increases.
Motorcyclists are doing their bit to save on fuel emissions and being considerate to the fact that running a bike is cheaper than a car on the rediculously low wages that most New Zealanders receive for long hours.
It's a knee jerk reaction to bad management and the tax payer gets hit with it yet again. Maybe limit claims as insurance companies do. Also cut out some of those six figure wages and run a slick business with stong systems and processes.
I have never heard such a load of crap in all my life, some polititians need a sodding rocket up the ass for lack of knowledge.
I agree with both of you.
I agree with both of you. This increase is in my opinion discouraging new riders. I think, that (perhaps I'm biased) but more motorbikes, and less cars on the road would be beneficial. Less pollution and less consumption of fossil fuels.
The reporting on accidents
The reporting on accidents involving motorcycles classify any accident involving a motorcycle as a"motorcycle ax, doesnt matter if on a farm or that a car/truck caused the ax. But any other crash involving other types of vehicle are reported as a accident , so the reports are screwed, therefore the statistics that are being used are wrong.
How about the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, this guarantees us freedom from discrimmination. Folks this is the thin edge of the wedge, sit still for this and we will all be screwed from another direction on something else.
This is a tax happy goernment that will only get worse, and have demonstrated that they cannot be trusted.
Can not agree more with all
Can not agree more with all of the above comments.
As a rider of over 35 years constantly on the road ,NO ACC claims and over 28 years on 750cc machines I stand to be taxed out of existence by these bungling bureaucrats.
My motorcycle also makes less horsepower than todays 600's so this new rating is based purely on cc ratings ..ridiculous!
Has anyone given thought to the amount of casualties that a single car driver can cause in one collision.
We regularly see wreckage on the news with a number of casualties in one vehicle,do these drivers pay a multiple fee for the other injuries they cause.
See how the ACC plays the blame game for motorcyclists,but says that their system does not blame anyone for accidents,yeah right!
I would agree the some guys returning to bikes later in life have got bikes that overpower them,(a 20 year riding gap needs re-training guys),as do numerous ladies I have seen on huge cruisers,these people need to be more realistic if they are to survive and not put up our insurance levies.
Maybe we need an opt-out to our own insurance scheme.I am sure with enough members we could do it at resonable cost, it would weed out the re-offenders too!(like motor-cross)
Perhaps one way is for everyone to put their bike on the reconstruction list when it next needs re-registering.
TIME TO LOOK AT THE WHOLE
TIME TO LOOK AT THE WHOLE SYSTEM. Should have been done years ago.Increase suggested is unfair.ACC is going broke. TRANPARENCY-HONESTY and FAIRNESS. no body will like the outcome tho.YES motorbikes are costing.ACC you have ALL the facts on Everybody that has claimed ACC. a few situations i can see.
1. HOSPITALS who is treated. who are not even paying ACC.
2, MEDICAL CLINICS. 3. How many still on a good thing. 4. payments maybe this should be looked at 80% of what. 5. ACC Rumours as to what wages etc are being paid. The list could go on.
The end result to all will mean everybody will pay more not just Motorbikes. I don't envy the Government sorting it out so its FAIR TO ALL. NOTE i did say fair to all, My views only.YES bikers do have accidents, i have been there. I WOULD LIKE TO THINK THE GOVERNMENT WILL BE HONEST and FAIR.