[ login or create an account ]
|
University of Canterbury Vice-Chancellor Dr Rod Carr says he understands why the Christchurch City Council has decided to refer the proposal to establish a National Conservatorium of Music at the Christchurch Arts Centre for consultation.
At its monthly meeting today the city council agreed to undertake a special consultative procedure on the council's involvement, through a council-controlled trading organisation, in the funding, development and subsequent lease of a national conservatorium on the Arts Centre site. "The city council is being asked to fund construction of the building on the Hereford Street car parking site and recoup all costs through the University's lease payments, including expenses and interest payments incurred during the construction phase and the University's occupancy," Dr Carr says.
He says the proposed conservatorium development represents a significant opportunity for the city's economic and cultural development that would be realised without any cost to Christchurch ratepayers.
"Our proposal that the Christchurch City Council build the conservatorium facility and recover costs through a long-term rental agreement with the University represents a significant opportunity for the city. However, we do not want to intrude where we are not wanted and it makes sense for the University to hear and understand the views of the community.
"I welcome clarification from Mayor Bob Parker that the Special Consultative Procedure is not about the development being located on the Arts Centre site or the design of the building but on the council's role in funding the project."
The city council will consider the Statement of Proposal for the Special Consultative Procedure at its next meeting in two weeks. If adopted, the council would then consult, consider submissions and make a final decision on the proposal within two months.
Dr Carr says the University will continue to inform the community of the proposed development. The FAQs below represent some of the matters that have been raised by members of the public since the proposal was announced on 11 June. What is the University proposing? We are proposing that the City Council lease from the Arts Centre Trust Board an area of land on Hereford Street currently used for car parking, construct the conservatorium building and enter into a long- term rental agreement with the University.
Would it be ratepayers who paid for the building? No. The City Council would fund construction of the building and recoup all costs through the University's lease payments, including expenses and interest payments incurred during the construction phase and the University's occupancy.
Is it known how much it would cost to construct the building? The plans by Sir Miles Warren have been reviewed by two firms of quantity surveyors and we are confident that we have a realistic idea. It would not make sense for us to disclose that information before tenders have been let.
What if the cost of construction exceeded budget? Whatever the full cost of construction, it will be recovered through the University's lease payments. Is the proposed building suitable for the site? The plans have been presented to the City Council's Urban Design Panel, the Historic Places Trust and the Arts Centre Trust Board. After modifications made in response to their feedback all three organisations have approved the design in principle. The Civic Trust has also been briefed on the design.
Could it be smaller? The current size is considered to be necessary for a facility of this sort. Further, it is no higher than the surrounding buildings and the quadrangle it creates will be the largest of the quadrangles.
Why would the building need an auditorium? Performance would be the focus of our programmes at the conservatorium. An auditorium would be necessary for rehearsals and performances by staff, students and others, and would provide a venue for public lectures.
Would the building only be used during term times? The building would be used all year round by our staff and students, and other community groups such as schools and organisations involved in music performance.
Why is the University seeking to involve the city council? The city council has the standing to provide support for a development of this scale and long-term nature. The City, like the University, has been around for over a hundred years. It is that stability we need for the commitments involved in this project.
Could it be built elsewhere in the centre city? Some 800,000 visits are made to the Canterbury Museum and surrounding area each year by out of town visitors. It is this passing crowd, as much as the citizens of Christchurch, that we want to expose to the talent within our music programme. This would not be the case if the conservatorium was anywhere other than at the Arts Centre.
Isn't there already a National School of Music in Wellington? The joint venture between Massey and Victoria universities has been deferred until 2013, with costs of its proposed building estimated to be about $60 million. Our proposal is nowhere near as expensive and represents an opportunity for Canterbury to become a national leader in music education.
Would students be required to commute between Ilam and the Arts Centre? Some staff and students would be required to commute, notably music performance students. However, there are already students in our Theatre programme who commute to the Arts Centre. Further, some music programmes would continue to be offered at Ilam for the likes of students studying for a double degree.
How can I learn more about the proposal? Visit www.music.canterbury.ac.nz/conservatorium.
Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff. Links will open on Gimme.
Health Tips, Recommended Movies, Recommended Books, Recommended Places.
Links will open on recommended.co.nz.
All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.
Voxy: Your Voice - Uncensored
Got Something to Say But No One’s Listening?
Message to Spread? – Distribute News
Product to Promote? – Run a Promotion
We Can Help You Spread The Word.
Comments
(Since this statement was
(Since this statement was issued on 3 July, a complaint has in fact been lodged with the Attorney-General, the Hon. Christopher Finlayson.)
Media Statement 31 July 2009
Released on behalf of Richard Sinke - Save Our Arts Centre Campaign
Art Centre paper reveals prior intention to consult the public
As early as June 2007, the Arts Centre Trust Board was considering the addition of a new building on the Hereford Street Carpark, possibly for the proposed School of Music. In a background information paper dated 19 June 2007, prepared for a Board meeting on 22 June 2007, the need for full public consultation on any such changes was recognised. It was also acknowledged that there was a need for a Draft Master Plan for the Arts Centre.
In relation to the Draft Master Plan, the information paper said:
"The master plan will outline conservation policy and design guidelines to ensure that any new buildings complements the heritage buildings and spaces.
This plan will be prepared by conservation architects and specialists and be released for public comment and submissions before consent is sought for any of these projects."
This was reinforced in the information paper under the heading “How the Public can Have their say”:
".... When we’ve finished a draft of the master plan this will also be released for public comment. That means the people of Christchurch will have a chance to comment on all major changes before any plans are finalised or consents applied for."
Statement from Richard Sinke, Dux de Lux in response:
"These statements give rise to a legitimate expectation that any proposed changes to the Arts Centre would:
only follow the preparation of a Draft Master Plan for the Arts Centre; and
be the subject of a full public consultation to enable the people of Christchurch (and New Zealand) to submit on the draft Plan.
Simply put, the current actions being taken by the Arts Centre Board in respect of the proposed National Conservatorium of Music are not in accordance with the statements in this information paper. In 2007 the Arts Centre Board created a legitimate expectation to undertake public consultation and they have yet to do so.
Clearly the contents of this information paper provide significant further justification to call into question the actions of the Arts Centre Trust Board.
I am challenging the actions of the Arts Centre Trust Board in proceeding with the Music School proposal in a manner which, without explanation, depart from an earlier Arts Centre document which clearly stated an intention to undertake public consultation.
On Monday 27 July, my lawyers Wynn Williams & Co delivered a letter for consideration by the Arts Centre Trust Board at a meeting that was being held that afternoon. The letter sought an urgent response to a significant failure by the Board to undertake public consultation as outlined in the June 2007 information paper.
Wynn Williams' letter also alerted the Board to other significant legal matters concerning the variations to the Trust Deed and the proposed funding and leasing arrangements involving the Christchurch City Council.
Through our lawyers we had asked that, before any further steps were taken in relation to changes on the site, the Board prepare a Draft Master Plan for the Arts Centre, and engage in full public consultation on that plan to enable the people of Christchurch and New Zealand to submit their views on the Plan.
As a consequence of my request apparently being ignored, I am left with little option but to instruct my lawyers to now look at the options of lodging a complaint with the Attorney-General, and possibly also file an application with the High Court for a declaration that the amendments made to the Arts Centre Trust Deed in 2007 were invalid", Mr Sinke said.
For further comment:
Richard Sinke
Dux de Lux
Ph: 366-6919
Mobile: 021-224-0033
Email: r.sinke@xtra.co.nz
www.soac.org.nz
or
David Lynch
Momentus Public Relations Ltd
Po Box 36321
Christchurch
New Zealand
Ph: 64-3-355-4422
Fax: 64-3-355-3336
Mobile: 021-226-9409
E-mail: david@momentus.co.nz
Once again we visited and
Once again we visited and lunched at dux at the art centre in the weekend,a continuing winter and summer outing for our family,hearing of the new building is quite a concern to my family,especially my 10 1/2 year old boy who along with us thinks that arrecting a large building of any sort would spoil the open atmosphere of the art centre not to mention the dux's serene enviroment and pleasant views and atmosphere.It would change the whole aspect of the atmosphere and outdoor enviroment ,PUT YOUR BUILDING ELSEWHERE LESS INTRUSIVE TO EVERYONE,THERE MUST BE OTHER SITES!!!!!!!!!!!!! Concerned family ,thankyou.