Recommended NZ | Guide to Money | Gimme: Competitions - Giveaways

Gene Ethics: India Rejects GM Eggplant

Contributor:
Voxy News Engine
Voxy News Engine

The Indian Government has banned the growing of genetically manipulated (GM) eggplant. The ban will remain until independent scientific studies satisfy the public and experts that the crop has no long term negative impacts on human health and the environment.

"This is a stunning victory for India's precautionary approach to GM crops," says Gene Ethics Director Bob Phelps.

"Their fair and democratic approach to all sides of the GM debate is a shining example.

"It contrasts starkly with the pig-headed stance of the Commonwealth, NSW, Victorian and WA governments that actively promote GM technology and its products while ignore the concerns of most shoppers, here and around the world.

"The South Australian, Tasmanian and ACT governments are listening and we congratulate them on extending their GM crop bans. They have unique marketing opportunities by remaining GM-free as their customers want.

"Influencing the Indian decision was the whistle-blown by Tiruvadi Jagadisan, a former Monsanto Director, who publicly disclosed that the company had faked scientific data to gain regulatory approvals.

"This confirms recent charges laid in Scientific American and Nature Biotechnology, that the GM industry withholds its products from independent research and does not allow negative findings to be published.

"It also casts doubt on the validity of assessments made by the Australian regulators of GM crops and foods - Food Standards Australia NZ (FSANZ) and the Office of Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR)," he says.

"Australian regulators base their approvals for GM canola, cotton, soybean and corn varieties on the same company-generated evidence as that discredited overseas. Many GM foods that are approved and on supermarket shelves here were judged to be unsafe by regulators in India and Europe.

"Australia's regulatory regime is not precautionary enough and a thorough overhaul is needed urgently so that applicants must submit genuinely scientific and independent evidence for exhaustive assessment.

"We call on Minister Roxon and Butler to be begin a review immediately," Mr Phelps concludes.

Comments

What hope do we have of

What hope do we have of getting a review. Letters to the Prime Minister's office and Minister Roxon about the poor standards of our GM regulatory authorities are immediately fobbed off to FSANZ for a 'one size fits all' irrelevant response.

Is this government too ignorant to understand the responsibilities of their portfolios, or is there another reason for their refusal to address serious concerns of the voting public?

A review is urgently

A review is urgently required in order that FSANZ and the Gene Tech Regulator are mandated to conduct independent, scientific studies in order to assess this new technology properly and thoroughly.

We have a similar situation

We have a similar situation in the UK -- it has recently emerged that our regulatory / advisory committees do not even read the dossiers submitted by Monsanto, Syngenta et al with their applications for GM consent. Apparently they trust the applicants to be honest and truthful, and to have reported all their safety experiments according to scientific norms. They are apparently the only people in the world who do trust the science from these multinationals, who have perfected every trick in the book for masking the real health effects of GM consumption. Let's not mince words -- the science in these dossiers is often fraudulent, as it was in the BT brinjal dossier in India. Until the regulators insist on genuinely independent GM safety research, none of us can trust what the regulators say or do. They are not there to protect the public. They are there to "facilitate GM approvals." Maybe we should not be surprised, therefore, that they are incompetent -- and just as corrupt as the GM multinationals.

The fight over GM is not a

The fight over GM is not a fight over scientific "truth". It is a fight between consumers on the one hand and the purveyors of GM on the other. Unfortunately, Australian politicians, unlike the European counterparts, have little stomach for a fight with the multinational corporations that market GM. The multinational corporations that market GM know that Australia is a soft touch.

GM Crops have not been shown

GM Crops have not been shown to be safe.

Competitions and Giveaways from Gimme.co.nz

Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff.  Links will open on Gimme.

Featured Recommendations from recommended.co.nz

All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.