[ login or create an account ]
|
Protecting Rio Tinto's Tiwai Point aluminium smelter from the full impacts of the emissions trading scheme will cost New Zealand $225,000 a year for every job at the smelter.
The country's only specialist carbon market information service, Carbon News (www.carbonnews.co.nz), reports Kent Duston of Wellington-based Autonomic Consulting as saying the subsidy will cost $209 million a year.
"It would be cheaper for the New Zealand taxpayer to pay every single Tiwai Point worker and contractor $200,000 per annum for the rest of their lives to simply stay home," Duston says.
Duston bases his calculation on the $14.13m a year worth of free carbon credits Rio Tinto will get a year under proposed changes to the emissions trading scheme, plus the opportunity cost of using the Manapouri hydro power scheme to power the smelter instead of using it to replace the Huntly coal-fired power station.
He told Carbon News that he did the numbers after hearing Climate Change Issues Minister Nick Smith say during his road-show to set New Zealand's 2020 emissions reduction target that subsidies were need to protect New Zealand jobs.
Duston said: "Anybody with access to the internet and a pocket calculator could have performed the same calculation, and I'm astounded that nobody has. We keep hearing that it's jobs, jobs, jobs, but nobody is asking the questions about the cost of those jobs."
In his submission, Duston says that based on a formula of 1.9 tonnes of carbon dioxide for every tonne of the 330 kilotonnes of finished aluminium the smelter produces each year, the plant has an emissions profile of 627,000 tonnes per annum.
"At the proposed capped price of NZ$25 per tonne, these emissions represent a liability to the smelters' owners of $15.675 million per annum.
"Under the proposed changes to the ETS, 90 per cent of the emissions units would be given to the smelter free of charge, subsidising its operations by $14.13 million per annum courtesy of the New Zealand taxpayer."
Dustan says that the smelter's emissions level is artificially low because it gets subsidised electricity from the Manapouri hydro power scheme.
"However, if this electricity were to be diverted to the national grid, the 850MW produced by Manapouri would be sufficient to decommission the coal-burning Huntly power station, which produces up to 15 per cent of New Zealand's electricity."
Replacing the emissions-intensive Huntly with Manapouri would result in a net decrease in liabilities to taxpayers of $209 million per annum, made up of the non-payment of the Rio Tinto subsidy ($14 million) and the non-payment of the Huntly subsidy ($195 million)," he said.
"There are 800 staff and 130 contractors employed at Tiwai Point. The Government argues that subsidisation of the carbon emissions for export industries is necessary to protect jobs. However it is obvious that the cost of retaining these jobs is exceptionally high - a stunning $225,000 per job per annum."
Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff. Links will open on Gimme.
Health Tips, Recommended Movies, Recommended Books, Recommended Places.
Links will open on recommended.co.nz.
All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.
Voxy: Your Voice - Uncensored
Got Something to Say But No One’s Listening?
Message to Spread? – Distribute News
Product to Promote? – Run a Promotion
We Can Help You Spread The Word.
Comments
how is this a subsidy? are
how is this a subsidy? are you arguing that the emmisions plan is purely taxation and therefore this is lost revenue for the government? I thought emmisions trading was to reduce emmisions. Surely this plant, using hydro, is a very low emmiting site by world standards. This article reads like a 'not in my backyard' argument, however the global CO2 situation requires action. Are you proposing that New Zealand should import all its aluminium needs from an inefficient chinese smelter and thereby increase world emmisions? Perhaps its this same 'dirty aluminium' that will construct the transmission network that is needed to get the Manapouri electicity to the North Island and force the closure of Huntly. If this analyst bothered to count the huntly power station jobs, associated coalmine and all the service industry roles associated with both the sites then the $200k/ job is significantly reduced - Duston said "Anybody with access to the internet and a pocket calculator", perhaps some basic understanding of the impacts is also required.
The Manapouri Power Station
The Manapouri Power Station was purpose-built in the 1960s to provide continuous high-load electricity to the Tiwai Point aluminium smelter. Had the station been designed and constructed for the national grid, it would have had up to 12 generators to provide for base and peak load generation. While Manapouri may, in the future, power South Island-based industries other than aluminium smelting, I disagree that the station's output could in any way be used to justify the decommissioning of the larger Huntly thermal station - this is far too simplistic a response to the electricity requirements of the upper North Island.