[ login or create an account ]
|
Auckland, Sept 9 NZPA - Taking on a new contractor for medical laboratory testing in Auckland is proving extremely frustrating, with some patients not receiving appropriate care, says the New Zealand Medical Association (NZMA).
The association's comments come in a week in which former provider Diagnostic Medlab (DML) re-ignited its row with successor Labtests by sending a videotape of patient complaints to media.
DML lost its battle to hold on to its contract with the Auckland, Waitemata and Counties Manukau district health boards (DHBs) this year, when the Supreme Court ruled in Labtests' favour.
NZMA chairman Peter Foley said the association's Auckland members had become used to a high standard of laboratory service and the present situation was unacceptable.
"There is quite extreme frustration being expressed at the problems they are encountering as the new arrangements are progressively introduced," he said.
"Frankly, the level of service reported to the NZMA is unacceptable in many respects, resulting in a number of patients not receiving appropriate care when they need it."
Dr Foley said at least one major Auckland primary health organisation was so concerned it was committing extra funding to get the needed care from elsewhere.
He said this was another unplanned cost to a fragile health system.
The NZMA acknowledged there was a transition process underway and that some issues could be resolved in time.
However, it had pointed out to successive governments and the DHBs that the transition was a critical time and carried substantial risk of services being jeopardised.
"We were assured that planning and contractual arrangements would be adequate to ensure both quality and continuity of the service," Dr Foley said.
"Sadly, our fears are being realised, and the problems which have emerged have caused a serious loss of confidence in the service and those that made the original decision."
Dr Foley said "the reassuring messages" from the DHBs and Labtests did not tally with what doctors and patients were reporting.
He called on Health Minister Tony Ryall to urgently instigate an independent review to monitor the situation and to recommend any changes.
Several days ago DML hired a personal relations firm to interview patients outside Labtests' new collection centres.
Twenty-five patients were asked about the services they received and seven negative responses were edited together and released to media.
Labtests chief executive Ulf Lindskog responded to the videotape by saying his firm was focusing on its own services and it was up to DML what it did.
NZPA AKL rl kk dw
Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff. Links will open on Gimme.
Health Tips, Recommended Movies, Recommended Books, Recommended Places.
Links will open on recommended.co.nz.
All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.
Voxy: Your Voice - Uncensored
Got Something to Say But No One’s Listening?
Message to Spread? – Distribute News
Product to Promote? – Run a Promotion
We Can Help You Spread The Word.
Comments
I totally agree that there
I totally agree that there needs to be a rethink of this very bad decision foisted on the Auckland public. Our local clinic had a huge crowd and long waiting times,nearly an hour........ many having come from another clinic with people quite literally queuing out the door! Another clinic has been closed.
I have commented to family that I do not think the Auckland public should need to tolerate any lead in time as the service we had was functioning extremely well.
Staff who have been at our local Diagnostic Clinic for over 20 years are out of a job and we are getting lousy service. Another friend was so badly treated both in the actual taking of blood and attitude of the staff member she has decided to pay for any further tests so she doesn't have to go back.This is in another part of the city.Nearly 2 weeks later she still has no results!
This decision will not save money........sick people will just add costs elsewhere.Anyone with any foresight could see this was going to happen. Heads need to roll.........those who made this decision and refused to back down should be held accountable.
Labtests is a good decision.
Labtests is a good decision. There is a perception that the decision to award the contract to Labtests was a bad decision. Saving $15 million and making those funds available to carry out discretionary surgery etc is not a bad decision.
Medlab is clearly conducting an orchestrated campaign to discredit the new service provider and has employed the services of a public relations expert to do just that. This is the reason that this issue has been in the media for so long. It is difficult to ascertain whether information in the public domain is real or or is being put there by vested interests. Clearly it is in the interests of Medlab to discredit the new service provider and have the contract broken into two parts with Medlab back in service. This would be detrimental to the very clear gains that this new contract brings.
My clear expectation as a member of the public is that the medical profession will get in behind the new contract with Labtests and make it work.
As to people who complain about excessive waits at the collection centres, it sounds as if the new service is is no different to the past, my personal experience with Medlab was that you needed to take a book and be prepared to wait an hour at the collection centre. This is unlikely to change much