Recommended NZ | Guide to Money | Gimme: Competitions - Giveaways

Professor Slams 'Super-City' Structure

Contributor:
Fuseworks Media
Fuseworks Media

A University Professor who has been intimately involved in Auckland's development over the past decade, launched a broadside today at what he describes as the demolition of local government in Auckland.

Professor Ian Shirley, Pro-Vice Chancellor of AUT University, and Professor of Public Policy with the University's Institute of Public Policy addressed the National Policy Makers Conference 2010 in Wellington today. A current member of the Auckland Regional Economic Development Forum, Professor Shirley maintains that the proposed model for the structure of Auckland's governance effectively removes local government from Auckland.

He argues that local government in Auckland will be replaced with "a corporate structure where the major beneficiaries will be the exclusive brethren of big business, merchant bankers and a narrow range of consultants dominated by legal and accountancy firms".

Within days of the publication of the Royal Commission's report on the Governance of Auckland, the Minister of Local Government introduced a badly conceived strategy that effectively undermines local government in Auckland. "It ignores history, fails to connect in any meaningful way with the diverse populations and neighbourhoods of the region and has established a corporate framework and process that will not gain the trust of ratepayers," Professor Shirley says.

According to Professor Shirley the policies are driven by a form of economic fundamentalism which equates 'governance' with managing a 'business' and reduces democracy to a token engagement in the decision-making systems of local and regional government.

In place of local Government Professor Shirley says the 21 local boards proposed will be toothless. "The current prescriptions for these boards and the minimal allocation of support services make it clear that the boards will be largely irrelevant in decision-making."

Further, 75 per cent of Auckland's public assets will be transferred to Council Controlled Organisations (CCOs) with the majority of directors for the CCOs appointed by government ministers. "In this case, CCO's stand for Corporate Controlled Organisations, with the elected members on local boards having little say over how those assets are used," he says.

Auckland's multi-cultural populations have no structural form of representation within the Super-city. There have been major changes in Auckland's population over the past two decades, with nearly one quarter of all children under 10 living in Pacific households. Although Mayoral candidates have proposed the establishment of advisory boards for children as well as other specific population groups, Professor Shirley dismisses these proposals as 'clip ons' controlled by Wellington.

"Overall the proposed new structure for Auckland's governance fails to address the distinctive characteristics of Auckland, its population profile, and its potential."

Professor Ian Shirley

Professor Shirley is Pro Vice Chancellor at AUT University and Professor with the University's Institute of Public Policy. His comments are based on a series of research studies as well as engagement with public policy in Auckland for more than 30 years. He is a member of the Auckland Regional Economic Development Forum and wrote the original outline for the Metropolitan Auckland Project.

Comments

Sadly the worst suspicions

Sadly the worst suspicions about the Super-city are probably valid. If it comes to pass that local government becomes a conduit to meet the mercantile needs of big business at the expense of the ratepayer and we are all left no means of 'checking and balancing' the abuse of power, then the ratepayer still has the options. The bottom line is the with-holding the payment of local taxes.
To be effective this would need to occur 'en masse' as processing the majority of Auckland's population through the courts would be impossible.
The ratepayer may have the final say but it would require both awareness and courage.

Christopher Wingate I agree

Christopher Wingate
I agree regarding with many of the points. However, local councils through to government have been hopeless and in n my 30 years at the coalface I have been beaten around the head by idiots in power who have zero accountability.
For any democratic structure surely there is the need for fiduciary standards backed by a practical transparent method to audit complaints. In other words, if we complain the final decisions are stupid- don't we need to have the ability to test it fast and effectively. That is democracy. Until then we get a mass produced letter that simply thank us for our view even though we are suffering from their stupidity. They ignore us yet they work for us. Bastards!
Yesterday I wrote- New Zealand has too many stupid people in positions of influence who have the right to talk, but the right to hide when challenged, leaving New Zealand the liability of stupidity

Competitions and Giveaways from Gimme.co.nz

Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff.  Links will open on Gimme.

Featured Recommendations from recommended.co.nz

All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.