[ login or create an account ]
|
As a result of a Coastal Coalition Official Information Request, the Attorney General has now released submissions on the Government's "Reviewing the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004". This is almost six month after submissions closed on 30 April.
"The summary document shows that on the most important issue, Question 1, 'Should the 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act be repealed?', 77 percent of respondents were opposed, 21 percent were in support and 2 percent did not know. Those opposing repeal (956), outnumbered those favouring repeal (256) by almost four (3.7) to one", Coastal Coalition spokesman, Dr Hugh Barr said.
"This is a massive public vote against the government's foreshore and seabed changes and it explains why the Attorney General has kept this information suppressed for so long.
But the bad news for the government doesn't stop there.
In response to the second key issue, Question 2, 'Do you support the overall approach proposed by the government?' (a change that will usher in the race-based carve-up of the coast), an overwhelming 91 percent of submitters were opposed, only 7 percent in support, and 2 percent undecided. This is thirteen to one in opposition.
"It is clear from this overwhelming public rejection of the two key issues in the Review, that there is no public mandate at all for the Government's proposed repeal of the 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act. "When the public Consultation Document was launched, the Prime Minister said that if there was not widespread support then the current law could remain in place.
"The summary of submissions shows that there is clearly no public support for the law change, so the prime Minister should honour his commitment to the New Zealand public and withdraw the Bill", Dr Barr said. The Summary of Submissions can be found at:
http://www.justice.govt.nz/policy-and-consultation/foreshore-and-seabed/reviewing-the-foreshore-and-seabed-act-2004/documents/Summary%20of%20Submissions
Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff. Links will open on Gimme.
Health Tips, Recommended Movies, Recommended Books, Recommended Places.
Links will open on recommended.co.nz.
All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.
Voxy: Your Voice - Uncensored
Got Something to Say But No One’s Listening?
Message to Spread? – Distribute News
Product to Promote? – Run a Promotion
We Can Help You Spread The Word.
Comments
John Key should honour his
John Key should honour his promises or resign, and the sooner the better before he completely ruins the country!
The lack of transparency in
The lack of transparency in the whole process is alarming. More than ever I'm worried about hidden agendas. There is no motivation other than money at stake.
Anybody that has had any exposure to Iwi consultation under the RMA will know that cultural issues are quickly abated with the check book. An unfortunate truth that is sadly perpetrated by a few opportunists.
National has been a huge disappointment. They are anything but straight-up and listen far more to minorities than majorities that voted them in. It is patronising.
Christopher Finlayson was a very poor choice as treaty minister. The conflicts of interest are immense. Like the rest of New Zealand, I can't help but wonder what hidden agendas are at work?
yes he should honour it
yes he should honour it
i oppose this plan
i oppose this plan