Recommended NZ | Guide to Money | Gimme: Competitions - Giveaways

Street: ACC Clients Renamed 'Swamp-Dwellers' Under New Tough Love Approach

Contributor:
Voxy News Engine
Voxy News Engine
Maryan Street
Maryan Street

Injured New Zealanders will be appalled by the culture change taking place at ACC which has been advised to be less 'customer-focused' to begin 'draining the swamp' of ACC clients, says Labour's acting ACC spokesperson Maryan Street.

'The information is contained in two reports released to Labour under the Official Information Act, as part of its Government-directed 'Value For Money Review' and explains why increasing numbers of injured New Zealanders are suffering extremely shoddy treatment from the corporation and being declined cover they are entitled to.

"The reports, prepared for the new ACC board last year, say ACC had 'moved too far towards customer focus' and needed to begin 'tightening the gateway by reducing the level and costs of treatment provided - especially rationalising the range of services available'.

"Perhaps the most disturbing example of the callous new approach however is the phrase used in the Morrison Low report to the ACC board which talks about the need to 'significantly cut back to essential and core (services) - effectively draining the swamp," Maryan Street says.

"So ACC staff are now being encouraged to view ACC clients as swamp-dwellers? It's not only offensive, it's a very disturbing example of the type of culture now pervading ACC.

"And what happens if staff fail to adopt the new 'tough love' approach (another phrase being used)? The reports make that clear. If they don't turn down enough claim applications they will get the sack.

"One report says 'there is a need for ACC to adopt more business/insurance-like behavioursthis may mean changes in the staffing and skills mix' and 'the introduction of stronger performance management mechanisms'.

"These reports raise serious questions about exactly what is going on at ACC and what staff are being directed to do. The public has a right to know how the 'gateway' is being tightened and exactly what services ACC staff are now being instructed to refuse to provide."

Comments

i was injured further by one

i was injured further by one of acc's "yes Drs' stating that i was fit for fulltime work in 2002 when one of the two injuries that I was sent back to work with seased up aafter just 16 weeks back in force.

I wrote to Acc minister at the time, but she did not want to know.

I was put off work by the hospital, but told by the acc help line that I was not entitled to wages as I was found fit and would have to wait for another assessment which cout take 3 weeks to 3 months, or stay off work with no pay, or stay at work

I was not informed that this should have been treated as a new injury( of which it wasn't as it had never got better) so had no choice but to stay at work I sustained a further injury because of this and now cannot work at all - wheres the logic after a cost to acc of over $300, 000 This is just the beginning

Competitions and Giveaways from Gimme.co.nz

Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff.  Links will open on Gimme.

Featured Recommendations from recommended.co.nz

All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.