[ login or create an account ]
|

It's time to save Radio New Zealand before the Tory vultures swallow it whole.
I have to applaud the bravery of the Radio New Zealand board who, under chairperson Christine Grice, are fending off the Tory attack into this country's last bastion of public broadcasting. They are defending the station and its legions of staff and loyal listeners (like me) against the depradations of Broadcasting Minister Jonathan Coleman who has said there will be no more public funding for it during the next five years. As Grice and chief executive Peter Cavanagh told a parliamentary select committee this week, any further cuts would see programme quality severely downgraded.
The cuts that are being mooted by the RNZ board could be disastrous. The board, in its proposals to Coleman, have made recommendations including axing the FM frequency, closing its Auckland studio, taking off overnight programming between 12 midnight and 6am and seeking sponsorship for Concert FM. Any of these recommendations would compromise the broadcaster's ability to deliver non-commercial, non-free market driven programming that appeals to a diverse audience. I also personally fear that programmes catering to minority audiences like One-In-Five,the programme dedicated to discussing disability issues, hosted by my friend Mike Gourley could be axed if underfunding continues. And what about flagship programmes like Morning Report, Checkpoint, and Nine to Noon? I doubt that any commercial broadcaster would be able to replicate these quality programmes which provide incisive, in-depth current affairs and light entertainment.
Already the private sector vultures are beginning to circle in order to feed off the Radio New Zealand carcass. The owners of the commercially driven news radio channels Radio Live and Newstalk ZB will be licking their lips at the prospect of getting a foot in the door via buying up RNZ's news feed. Ironbridge Capital and Clear Channel Communications USA, the multinational, foreign-based owners of our private radio networks will want to see New Zealand become one of the first countries in the Western world to either privatise or corporatise its public radio services. While other comparable nations public broadcasters (such as the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and the British Broadcasting Corporation) have faced fiscal crises over the last ten years due to underfunding issues, they have not gone the full hog and commercialised their networks at all in response.
And here is one more irony. This week the Government decided to prop up the fiscally troubled West Coast Timberlands forests in order to save thousands of jobs in that region. A good move but one has to be cynical as well given that West Coast-Tasman is a marginal National seat. Ironically, at the same time, they are saying stuff you to Radio New Zealand as the Nats figure that much of their audience are nothing other than liberal, trendy-lefty, pinko, cardigan and sandle wearing commies who tend to live in Labour-held bastions like Wellington Central. Therefore, the Tories would never get away electorally with closing down the forestry industry on the West Coast whereas they are figuring (wrongly in my view) that they could get away with pulverising Radio New Zealand.
This is another aspect to ponder within the current debate.
The reality is that the Government ain't going to stump with the extra cash. Like other areas of the public domain, be they the conservation estate or public radio, the Tories are prepared to sacrifice them in order to downsize the state in order to give tax cuts to their wealthy mates.
It's time to tell them to lay their hands off Radio New Zealand and all other services that exist for the public good!
Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff. Links will open on Gimme.
Health Tips, Recommended Movies, Recommended Books, Recommended Places.
Links will open on recommended.co.nz.
All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.
Voxy: Your Voice - Uncensored
Got Something to Say But No One’s Listening?
Message to Spread? – Distribute News
Product to Promote? – Run a Promotion
We Can Help You Spread The Word.
Comments
The down grading of National
The down grading of National Radio NZ would be horrific in relation to current affairs investigatory journalism in this country. In my opinion it is the one media for in-depth intelligent and readily accessible coverage of issues that should be exposed and debated in what is an increasingly dumbed down journalism sector. Even the more entertainment based aspects of Radio NZ is informative and expansive of the mind! Don't you dare go there Nats!
Broadcasting Minister
Broadcasting Minister Jonathan Coleman - keep you hands off Radio NZ. We have already lost quality TV reporting on Television NZ and Radio NZ is the only median left. I am a daily listener to the Network and find its programming excellent. Where else could we go for informative news both locally and overseas.
In my 73 years of life I
In my 73 years of life I have seen Governments come and go and over the years, noted that Tory Governments tend to wave a big stick at Public Radio whenever they get a chance just as they did with the old NZBC, both TV and Radio. One government flogged off the commercial arm of Radio NZ, (now the Radio Network or TRN), so as to downgrade the non commercial National and Concert programmes.
Without the profits of the Commercial side to help pay for the non commercial side, it was then up to the Government to pay for non commercial radio. This gave them much more control of public radio as whenever RNZ displease the incumbent government, all that government has to do, (and boy do they know it and use the method of control) is to cry poor and threaten to cut RNZ's funding at worst, or not increase it in accordance with inflation which the government seem inept to control in the first place.
I fear for our good public service radio. I suspect that the Government are currently miffed at them over some programme that perhaps shows the government in a poor but true light and so out comes the old 'cut your money' trick to punish them and dumb them down a bit more. It is time governments stopped interfering with public radio and other areas of public service that are supposed to be non political and instead, mind the business of the country where they are supposed to.
The government can afford to give their rich mates a huge tax break it seems but it is at the expense of our good public service including our Radio, all of which serves all New Zealanders. But as usual Pensioners and other folk on low incomes have to foot the bill for the government's proposed TAX breaks for the Rich and their other excesses.
Bash Broadcasting used to be the catch cry of National Party governments in the days before private radio and TV as it was something that the public could see and hear as being the government taking some action. Yeah Right!. We New Zealanders can see right through your old and tired attempts to fool us. The Cost of Radio NZ doesn't seem to me to be very high at all for what they give us. For Goodness sake leave RNZ alone and fund it properly! I have to say, the Labour Party also messed about with a perfectly good radio and Television service in this country. The minister at the time, one Roger Douglas split the one NZBC into four different organizations all with their separate boards and expense accounts etc. That in my view was a very Stupid ACT!
Plain and simple: RNZ is
Plain and simple: RNZ is part of New Zealand's national heritage. It should be protected like the kiwi. Any budget reduction is unrealistic.
In our justifiable anger at
In our justifiable anger at Coleman and his moronic thinking, do not forget Labour wasn't exactly RNZ's biggest friend.
Labour consistently underfunded RNZ and when Minister Maharey got sick of the RNZ board telling him that, he hired KPMG in 2007 to investigate.
KPMG's findings? Exactly what RNZ board had said - funding was 20 percent short of what was necessary to meet statutory obligations. Labour did nothing. So take their current outrage with a grain of salt.
Coleman's on a loser here. Even arch right wingers value the RNZ news service and don't want it diluted. Coleman's managed to get up noses right across the political spectrum.
We are talking about a step
We are talking about a step back for democracy here!! The govt. again trying to control broadcasting through holding up funding. Everyone in N Z should have access to a free, open minded, broadcasting service. RNZ is probably the best we've got. Hands off John Key. We must not let this go without a big outcry.
The only thing that keeps
The only thing that keeps road rage at bay whilst stuck in Auckland traffic on our joke of a motorway system is the debate and information and news that comes from RNZ. Leave it alone. It is the only balancing force against the jarring advertising, head-banger music and inane talkback which is all you get on the other stations. If you take it away all I'll have left is the BBC and that has no local content.
RNZ is part of our culture. It is as important to this Pakeha as some things are to Maori.
The idea of closing down at midnight (or whatever) is touchingly quaint - I do remember Commercial stations closing down at night. I was young then. I thought we had evolved from that.
National take note: You will lose votes unless you curb vandal Coleman.
Pragnum
If the funding freeze on RNZ
If the funding freeze on RNZ indicates the culture mapped out by the current government, then we can cringe. However, even as I cringe, within arises a rage against the personable yet poisonous John Key and cohorts-in-cabinet. Unlike the Dalai Lama whom he snubs whilst kow towing to the Chinese regime, NZers hopefully will not avoid conflict.
JK says he likes helping people, which is why he wanted his current job. I would disagree that gagging the voice of this excellent little nation is helping grow the health and well being of NZers and our culture in any way. Raising GST without excluding GST on food will deprive us socially as surely as broadcasting cutbacks will culturally and spiritually.
JK does not need this job to feed his family, perhaps he could consider it a voluntary position and donate the proceeds of his efforts to the RNZ budget. That would be helping with our well being as would feeding the children of already stressed Nzers GST free food.
For $35M (I think that is
For $35M (I think that is the figure that is being used right?) RNZ could stay alive and prosper.
The Board needs to think about creating work flows more aligned to the 21st Century.
There're valid points in the Gov's requests about the location of RNZ's offices , the tax payer's money should be spent diligently and if there's mileage from 'soft-sponsorship' why not?
As an media executive in Asia, I would love to get my hands on that sort of money to make a public radio service.
The current National
The current National Broadcasting political cry concerns the need to stop wasting money. The first move should be to investigate why three presenters are required to introduce the mid- week morning news broadcasts, while only one is required during the week-end.
The week-end introduction is much better with the news no longer delayed, while the three employees play childish Maori word games.
Eliminate the obvious and move on from there.
Radio New Zealand could help
Radio New Zealand could help save itself if it didn't spend so much on Maori broadcsting. Morning Report's constant hectoring us in the Maori language and spending money on staff having pronunciation lessons is a good example. There are, after all, many Maori broadcsting stations.
Keep Concert Radio
Keep Concert Radio sponsorship-free and commercial-free! It is an invaluable sanctuary in a world invaded and bombarded by commercials. The precious music of composers, our precious sanctaury, would be desecrated by diabolical advertizing.
never listen to it, but I
never listen to it, but I have to pay for it.
Typical. If it has no audience, and can't pay its way, who cares. close it
That's a message on behalf of all us kiwis below 50 who can't understand why it's the only radio network to get special treatment.
"Don't give me culture" all over again eh ?
@ anonymous, All taxpayers
@ anonymous,
All taxpayers have to pay for things they don't use, or have no use for. For me that would be the gazillions pumped into world cup rugby and rich mens' yacht racing. RNZ and the Concert programme, in particular, enable me to start the day in a serene mood. The mark of a civilised country is that it doesn't condemn its citizens to the endless yap and bray of commercial radio.
And since I like the
And since I like the "endless yap and bray of commercial radio" my opinion is meaningless. Ever wonder why young people can't be bothered with forums like this? It's you attitude of superiority. The same attitude that makes me not listen to national radio, or Concert FM, even though I am a Graded musician who you possibly have paid to hear me play.
The fact is I like a very broad spectrum of music, and hate people who talk down to me. RNZ needs to get real, or die. Get over it, Life is hard.
A few contradictions here.
A few contradictions here. You obviously are bothered about forums like this otherwise you wouldn't be writing to them, and good for you! But you should attack the message, not the messenger. I have no attitude of superiority. Perhaps your listening has inflammed your temperament - dose of serenity required! You are also making assumptions about my taste in music. The "yap and bray" - by the very choice of those words - refers to the vocal rather than than the instrumental. It is more about the repetitious, vacuous advertising than the music played.
Air of superiority comes
Air of superiority comes from my experience of listening to national radio. Its was supposed to be a reference to the attitude I hear from national radio, a slip up at my end, even though some of the posts to this blog could have come directly from the afore mentioned station.
Morning report is a clasic example. They take themselves far to seriously, and think that their opinion actually matters. I'd rather here from those making the news, to those commenting on them. Unfortunately music doesn't pay my way so I work, and I think that's been a godsend for me as it's made me see a whole different view of the world; that of hard working small business people. The very sort who can't listen to radio NZ for very long before breaking into abusive ranting about people who need to experience the real world.
Having to pay the bills might actually be good for some of these people, It did wonders for Mike Hosking.
I worked in a small business
I worked in a small business in the real world and during hours on the road found RNZ's Nine to Noon with Sharon Crosbie, Maggie Barrie and, later, Kim Hill to be wonderfully informative and entertaining. Their choice of music was, generally, execrable; but you have to learn to take the rough with the smooth - far better than commercial radio, where, usually, you have to take the rough with the rough .... Yes, morning report is often rudely contentious - not a good way to start the day for me. Hence my preference for the serenity of Concert FM. Try it, Mr or Ms Anonymous graded musician, and learn to enjoy the music you claim to play for us snobs.
It's great to learn that
It's great to learn that this government is making an effort to return our Radio New Zealand broadcasting to the standard that we enjoyed many years ago. Remember Peter Drummond?
It was Clive Drummond not
It was Clive Drummond not Peter and in his day, there was no Radio NZ News. The only news broadcast was 9pm of an evening and that was normally are repeat of the Overseas Service of the BBC which was received via shortwave radio. IT was called the NZBS back then and later made a corporation and became the NZBC.
No! The Government is NOT making any effort to return Radio New Zealand to the Standard we enjoyed years ago and besides, the standard of Radio NZ today is very good indeed. Radio New Zealand had a commercial division a few years ago that consisted of the Z stations which made up one commercial network which they later renamed Newstalk ZB(ie 1ZB,2ZB,3ZB 4ZB and 1ZA, 2ZA, 3ZA and 4ZA and other Z class stations.
At one time, many years ago there was even a 5ZB and that was a traveling Radio station mounted in an NZR Railway carriage. The 5ZB station was towed around the railway towns of NZ and spent a week at a time in each town it stopped at. RNZ started a Classic Hits FM and the ZMFM stations but a national government flogged them off as "The Radio Network" and made National Radio and Concert FM fully Taxpayer funded. At one time, we paid a radio and later, TV license to hep pay for the stuff that government wanted the NZBS and later, NZBC to broadcast.
The commercial networks that Radio New Zealand owned helped to pay for the National Programme and concert programme which were also partly funded by the License fee.
Radio New Zealand was developed over the years into two a world class Public Radio Networks but this Government seems hell bent on muzzling it by the old Government trick (and Labour were just as bad at it as National) of cutting funding to force them to toe the official Government line. Governments of both colours have done that time and again in the past and usually they did it to take the public's mind of other things that they were going to do that they knew that were unpopular. In other words, they use Radio NZ, (and just you watch, TVNZ will be next), to act as a decoy to divert our attention away from other moves which will affect us all negatively and they do this by making unpopular moves with respect to public broadcasting, be it Radio or Television.
Radio NZ has developed into a good service that is popular with a significant section of the public. It is a part of the Civil defense mechanism in NZ and it shouldn't be nobbled in the way that the Government is about to do. For goodness sake leave it be.
JWD