Recommended NZ | Guide to Money | Gimme: Competitions - Giveaways

Would The Real Glenn Beck Please Stand Up?

Read More:
Contributor:
Chris Ford
Chris Ford
Glenn Beck

Last week, conservative American media commentator, Glenn Beck hosted what he billed as a 'Restoring Honour' rally at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington DC.

This rally, staged on August 28, was designed to evoke the famous Martin Luther King Junior civil rights march rally held at the same location and on the same day 47 years before. Beck, almost messianic like, called the rally to supposedly demonstrate that many millions of Americans share his views about the decline of patriotism and spiritually-based family values. What Beck was attempting to convey the image of was that he was leading the creation of a new civil rights movement, this time of mainly white, urban middle class Americans. This evocation of the King name in the service of a conservative agenda angered black civil rights leaders, including the Reverend Al Sharpton. After all, King was known to hold views that were genuinely progressive and rooted in social justice. In this respect, Beck's views have nothing in common with those of the late Dr King's (even though Beck did invite King's right wing niece, Alveda, to the rally to give the false impression that King himself would have approved of it).

The reality is that this march represents one more sign that neoconservatives are hitting the streets of America in increasing numbers. While populist conservative movements have come and gone before in America, what is different about this renewed level of activism is that it has been a reaction to the end of the long Reaganite and Bushite ascendancy in the White House. I believe this is the case as for almost thirty years, the neoconservative consensus held sway over all of the Oval Office's occupants between 1981 and 2009. I also believe this because even Bill Clinton, following the Republican congressional sweep in 1994, became a large scale convert to Reaganism. With the global financial crisis in 2008 came the election of Barack Obama, the first progressively inclined president for nearly 45 years.

For this reason, Obama has acted as a red flag for the conservative right , even more than Bill Clinton ever did. Last year, Tea Party rallies across America saw protesters carrying placards confusingly depicting Obama as both a Nazi and a Communist. Truly, he is neither. But that doesn't matter to the neoconservative hordes. To many of them (including the so-called 'birther' movement) Obama is nothing but a foreign-born leader who is secretly a Muslim. In the post 9/11 political and cultural environment, Obama has been grist to the mill for this small milieu of neoconservative opinion.

Enter Glenn Beck. Involved in the media since his teens, he has become a star presenter over the past two years at the Rupert Murdoch-owned Fox News Network. Prior to that, he was a colourful talking head for CNN before his neoconservative convictions saw him jump over to Fox. From watching what I have of Beck's programmes (which screen in New Zealand via Sky Television), they appear to be amusing and at the same time alarming. Amusing because I can't work out if Glenn is acting as a comedian (which he also is) or is being serious. Either way, his programmes warn about the fiendish plots being hatched by the Obama administration to enslave America. I can particularly remember one programme (which triggered massive laughter from me) where Beck said he had inside information that the Obama team was developing a plan to open concentration camps to intern Americans opposed to political correctness. Alarmingly, from what I could see of Beck's expression though, he meant it seriously. If that is the case, then Glenn is seriously deluded. His fellow Fox commentator, the odious Bill O'Reilly, I remember jumped on this bandwagon the next night. 

However, there appears to be one difference between Beck and O'Reilly - the latter hasn't yet staged a political rally. What does alarm me is that Beck is attempting to influence the Republican electoral campaign and if the party gains congressional seats at the mid-term elections (as seems likely) then a number of neoconservatives, who are fellow travellers with Beck, will hold sway over the political process. This is a frightening prospect as many millions of Americans who rely on the federal government (mainly the very poor, working families and even patriotic war veterans) will face cuts to services and benefits if a Republican majority pushes for severe spending cuts to trim back the deficit. At the same time, Beck and his minions will go on to push Obama over any future Supreme Court appointments so that things like anti-gun laws and abortion rights are stripped away.

As for Beck, I believe that he's also full of his own self-importance. I wouldn't be surprised if, at some future point, he ran for public office on a Republican ticket with Tea Party backing.  After all, his fellow Tea Party sympathiser and former vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin spoke at the rally too. And Palin caused the John McCain presidential campaign huge headaches last time. If Glenn Beck were to run for Congress in say 2012, then more moderate presidential aspirants like Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal might be tempted to distance themselves from endorsing somebody like him when it came to the general election.

In the meantime, the real Glenn Beck - comedian or aspiring politician - should stand up and say what he's really up to. 

 

Comments

I read your commentary on

I read your commentary on Beck with interest because I continue to be puzzled as to why this man seems to bring out such negativity in liberals. Beck can say whatever he wishes; but unless he voices the largely unexpressed views of his followers he has no power. My point is that Beck is the spokesman for a growing number of Americans who feel betrayed by their government. One may argue that President Obama is a well-meaning young man who has a particular vision for his country and that his motives spring from conviction. I have no problem with this point of view. The problem I do have is that most middle-class Americans do not share his world view, and this does not seem to trouble him in the least. He appears to believe in the famous adage: If a man is more right than his neighbors he constitutes a majority of one. Unfortunately, America did not elect Barack as a messiah; they elected him to represent them. This he does not do. Admittedly there are those that are very happy with the president. These individuals appear to fall into two groups: the elites who feel comtempt for the ignorant middle class, and all those who benefit from big government -- the unions, the politicians, and the underclass. As much as Beck seems to concern you so does Obama scare the heck out of me. I guess I would also ask: Would the real Barack Obama please stand up.

Ignorant extremist taking

Ignorant extremist taking advantage of those that are disillusioned with their lot. The recession has kicked in and everyone is hurting. It's usually the"middle-class" that winge the most because their road to riches has halted. They've had to curtail their spending like the majority and this to them seems unfair and they are been duped by Glen to direct their angst and anger, misfortune at Barack.Which anybody can see is Glen is an opportunist red-neck and under the guise of freemdom to speak has coloured this in a cloaks of bigotry, racism and basically hatred! IT's a Recession! People from all walks of life are hurting! If some people are so dumb to think any leader, president, prime minister, can snap their fingers and hey presto we're out of it is an idiot. It's the middle classes rampant consumerism and greed over the last 10 years which has contributed hugely to this slump in the economy! Get over it! Maybe it's time to reassess your values Glen or do us a favour and fall on something sharp!

What's more interesting from

What's more interesting from our perspective about this Glenn Beck phenomenon is that "The Folks in Control," however one might characterize them in terms of race, status, class, wealth, geographic location or whatever, allowed our current situation to develop over arguably the last 50 - 100 years, and now there are complaints by a vocal group of concerned citizens.

Is it possible, as postulated by some, that the liberal, conservative, progressive, corporate and banking interests, and libertarian POWER FORCES in our society are laughing all the way to the bank, and that we minions with little money and power (the members of the Institute for Applied Common Sense included) are the ones complaining? And that because of new technological advances in communication and the power of the Internet, the voice of the minions is now being disseminated with greater force, essentially saying, "Stop! Enough is enough!"?

Furthermore, is this a case of the minions fighting for limited scraps at the bottom of the heap, while the real riches are controlled by a few? Have we at the bottom been pitted against one another?

Is this arguably a populist movement somewhat similar to the one led by "the Great Commoner," William Jennings Bryan at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th Centuries?

Is what we are experiencing simply the most vocal expression of the perhaps 80% of we citizens at the bottom of the heap?

Competitions and Giveaways from Gimme.co.nz

Popular competitions and giveaways from Gimme.co.nz: NZ's People Powered Guide to Free Stuff.  Links will open on Gimme.

Featured Recommendations from recommended.co.nz

All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us through our contact form if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.